Calling for Investigation of Hiring Practices —Hiring a family affair in Mass. government

And you thought job corruption was just limited to a few Democratic legislators?  Ha!
It’s a way of life in Boston.

 

Rep. Mar Lombardo (R) is calling for a special investigation of the hiring practices of several government agencies…..wait ’til you read or see the scandal’s details.  Once again, tax dollars go to the insiders…

As you can probably guess, Deval and gang will again try to snuff out any look-see…but, just check out our WALL OF SHAME and see all the Democrats who have done time or copped a plea to avoid time (and more on the way…so many days…so many to post….).

Fox Undercover Report:

 

Hiring a family affair in Mass. government
Posted: May 20, 2013 7:57 AM EDT
Updated: May 20, 2013 8:00 AM EDT
(FOX25 / MyFoxBoston) Mike Beaudet
(FOX25 / MyFoxBoston) Kevin Rothstein, Producer
(MyFoxBoston.com) – The largest state agency is a nest of nepotism where relatives of higher-ups are
routinely hired over more qualified applicants, a state HR insider tells FOX Undercover, a claim that’s backed
up by hiring and payroll records at the Executive Office of Health and Human Services.
“There’s vast, vast amounts of nepotism, vast amount of crony hiring. And it’s all done by gaming the hiring
process to make it look legit when it is not legit,” the HR insider told FOX Undercover reporter Mike Beaudet.
The whistle blower, who spoke on the condition he not be identified, said “a lot of the resumes will go right in
the garbage” unless they have the right connection to steer them through the hiring process at Health and
Human Services, which employees about 22,000.
“I came into state government to serve the people. And what I found was state employees serving themselves,”
he said.
For example, there’s Donna Shetler, who works for Health and Human Services as a human resources
manager. Her two sons both got jobs in the department for which she provided HR services.
“Can we ask you a couple of quick questions?” Beaudet asked her.
“Nope. Sorry. Got nothing to say to you,” she replied.
“How did both your sons get hired?” Beaudet asked.
“I got nothing to say,” she said.
One of her sons has since left. The other, Christopher Shetler, followed his mother when she moved to another
department, and now he’s also in human resources, working with his mom on the 7th floor of a state office
building at 600 Washington St. in Downtown Crossing.
“We’re actually doing a story about nepotism. How people get their jobs. And I’m just wondering, did you get
your job because of your mom?” Beaudet asked Christopher Shetler.
“No. I got my job because I interviewed for it,” he replied.
“You followed her from one agency to another. Is that just a coincidence?” Beaudet asked.
“I guess so. That’s all I got. That’s it,” he replied.
But our insider says it would be an unbelievable coincidence for one relative to follow another to the same
department.
“The chance of that happening in the HR world, the chance of that happening in a legitimate hiring process, is
the chance of being attacked by a great white shark and Big Foot on the same day. It just doesn’t happen,” he
said.
But they happen all the time in state government, the insider says.
The insider says he says he overheard state human resources personnel officer Kathy Redfern make a phone
call to get her daughter a state job.
“Her exact words were, ‘My daughter is applying for this position, and I would like special consideration given
to her,’” he said.
“What did that mean?” Beaudet asked him.
“Special consideration means hire my kid,” he replied.
Redfern denied helping her daughter get a job with the state.
“No, I did not,” she said.
“How did she get that job?” Beaudet asked.
“She applied for it,” Redfern replied.
Her daughter, Jessica Redfern, was hired as a nursing assistant by the Department of Public Health, which
falls under Health and Human Services, where her mother works.
“Did you ask that special consideration be given to her?” Beaudet asked.
“Nope. Did not,” she replied.
“No funny business going on?” Beaudet asked.
“No,” Redfern replied. “It’s entry level. I mean, she just applied for it.”
Roubina Panian is another child of a state worker to also get a state job. She was hired as a social worker by
the Department of Transitional Assistance, which falls under Health and Human Services, where her mother,
Rita Panian, is a human resources supervisor.
FOX Undercover shared the family connections with the Patrick administration. Spokesman Alec Loftus said
the state had already been tipped off to some of the connections, investigated them and found no wrongdoing.
“Shouldn’t people who work in human resources avoid even the appearance of a conflict?” FOX Undercover
reporter Mike Beaudet said.
“Absolutely, and when we did our review we determined there was no conflict,” Loftus said. “All the proper
procedures were followed and all the proper disclosures were made and all of these candidates met and
exceeded the entry requirements for these positions.”
But the last point about minimum entry requirements is up for debate in the case of job applications filled out by
some other relatives of state workers.
Janice Raposo was hired as a social worker in the Department of Transitional Assistance, a job that pays up to
MEMBER CENTER: Create Account | Log In
Site
Web
79° Search… Fitchburg
Clear
Hiring a family affair in Mass. government – Boston News, Weather, Sports… http://www.myfoxboston.com/story/22295972/2013/05/20/hiring-a-family…
5/21/2013 1:06 PM
$58,000-a-year.
She has three relatives who work for that department, which she noted on her application. She has a
bachelor’s degree in sales and meeting management, and her past jobs include sales management positions at
hotels and work as a registration specialist at the Lahey Clinic.
“Three relatives working for DTA and then she gets a job in DTA with no social work experience? How is that
possible?” Beaudet asked Loftus.
“All of these candidates met the minimum entry requirements of the position, which is a college degree or two
years of relevant experience,” Loftus replied.
Loftus also says Susan Fratus met the requirements to be a social worker in the Department of Transitional
Assistance, where her brother Richard works as an assistant director. She has no college degree and her most
recent job was working for 10 years as store manager at Cardsmart.
“No college degree. No social work experience. That’s the most qualified candidate?” Beaudet asked Loftus.
“We have candidates, like I said, on the list that you sent me that had master’s degrees, were trilingual,” Loftus
replied.
Actually there’s just one person with a master’s degree who’s trilingual. Christopher Fahlbeck is also a social
worker at the Department of Transitional Assistance. He and his brother both got hired at DTA within three
months of each other. Their mom also works for department.
“How is it possible that her two sons get hired in the same agency she works in?” Beaudet said.
“Like I said, we did the review and we determined everything went by the book,” Loftus replied.
But that’s the problem, according to the insider.
“Basically, what they do is they rig the whole process from start to finish to get the people in they want to get
in, but create a paper record to make it all look legit, so if anybody comes asking questions, ‘Here! We just
hired the best candidate.’”
The state denies that resumes of more qualified people are thrown out. But the spokesman did say the
administration will look into the allegation that the HR employee made a phone call and asked for special
consideration to get her daughter hired.
FOX Undercover contacted everyone named in this story. Most didn’t get back to us or declined to comment,
but we did hear from the husband of Judith Fahlbeck, whose two sons work with her. He said his sons are both
qualified for their jobs and he isn’t aware of any influence his wife had over the hiring process.

Michael Graham’s Fight Speech

From one of the BEST talk radio hosts and BEST election strategists, he is Michael Graham.

Michael_Graham

Check out this link to hear the best from the best:

CLICK TO DOWNLOAD/PLAY PODCAST SPEECH TO MASSGOP.

 

Choosing the Next RNC National Committee Woman for the MA-GOP

It’s been a very quiet race for RNC Committeewoman. But with just few days left to go, I thought I’d share my criteria.

 

1) Positions on the issue:

A) A conservative woman who espouses all the core principles articulated RNC National Platform.

2) Commitment to the party:

A) Willing serve out at least this term.

B) No conflicts of interest or inherent conflicts related to schedule.

C) Freedom to travel

3) Track record:

A) Working for and electing other candidates

B) Raising money for candidates

C) An experienced operative who is principled but understands political   strategy.

4) Image:

A) Whoever is elected must project energy and be able to attract the growing demographic of   young professional women to the Republican Party.

So let’s look at the candidates and see how they fit this criteria.

 

BALANCE SCALE

 

Positions:
My understanding is that all 3 candidates are conservative Republicans of the highest character, who have a track record of supporting the entire platform. So on that count it’s a wash. But in a good way. This means this race is not going to be battle over ideology. Rather the decisions will be made based on who has the specific qualifications and experience required for this position.

And here again, all three women are qualified, intelligent, and successful in their own right. So then what we are looking for is the right fit for this position, at this time, for the MA-GOP.
Sheila

Commitment:
The situation in Massachusetts is such that we are in a rebuilding mode. We desperately need and deserve someone who can afford to aggressively work for other candidates, while selling the Republican brand. Likewise, 2014 will bring us State as well as Congressional elections, not to mention a Senate race— no matter the outcome of the June special election. Again, we need and deserve an RNC National Committeewoman who can dedicate her self entirely to these races.

Sheila Harrington currently holds a seat as State Representative and presumably will either be seeking re-election or higher office.  Holding office is already more than a full time job; running for office becomes a second full-time job. So I see time and scheduling issues right off the bat. She will also need to be a very partisan spokeswoman for the party. Defending the party and attacking her Democrat colleagues, might not be in her best interest, as she runs her local race. So there are certainly potentials for conflicts.

Looking at both Chanel Prunier and Helen Hatch, it would seem that both have the time to do the job. Both are already doing it in their current capacities. Neither one of them holds a Constitutional Office at the State or Federal level. So they aren’t going to be torn between seeking re-election, doing their job as legislators, and giving 100% to the highly partisan job of RNC National Committeewoman. This is what they have been and are already doing now.

Helen

Track record:
Here we start to see even further distinction. To the best of my knowledge, Sheila Harrington doesn’t have an extensive record of raising money, working for, and electing other candidates. That’s not a knock. It is not to say she couldn’t do it, given the opportunity. Sheila is very accomplished attorney. She may well also have the required the skillset to do this job.  But she simply doesn’t have the record; certainly not the same extensive record of both Helen and Chanel.

Helen Hatch, as a State Committeewoman has certainly worked for candidates in and around her district. Jim Dixon and Gerry Dembrowski come to mind immediately. Marc Lombardo was elected State Representative in her district under he watch. And of course we all know of her hard work for and dedication to Sandi Martinez over the years.

But here I’ve got to give the clear edge to Chanel Prunier. Her record in this regard, far exceeds both of the other candidates. Chanel is everywhere. She’s not only worked for candidates all over the state, she’s played a major roll in their victories. Our gains on Beacon Hill in 2010 were in great part do to her work. Most recently, she helped Leah Cole win a seat that had been previously been held by Democrats for at least 10 years. So Chanel not only has record of helping candidates, she’s got a winning track record. Beyond that Chanel has a unique ability to organize, motivate, and put grassroots a boots on the ground. This is exactly the kind of experience and past performance we should be looking for from a candidate to meet our current needs.

Chanel profile pic.

Image:
Normally, I reject identity politics.  To be quite frank, I find that patronizing, condescending, and silly to specifically pick someone based on demographic appeal. Rather, we need to be choosing the best and brightest, the person with the best ideas and qualifications, irrespective of race, creed, color, gender, age shape, and so forth.  But, the fact is we must have both a RNC Committeeman and RNC Committeewoman, instead of just two RNC Committee members. So by definition, these positions play into identity politics. That being the case, after we consider all of the aforementioned points, then we need to think about the image we want to project.

We must consider how to best disarm the Democrats and Media who seek to paint the GOP as out of touch with the growing demographic of single, young, professional women.  The stereotype is that this age group, is inherently liberal, they want a nanny state, they are primarily concerned with their “Lady Parts.”  Therefore choosing someone from Chanel’s generation to be the face of the party is definite plus.  She can stand up and say: Yes, I’m a young, single, career oriented woman.  I’m also conservative. I don’t need or want the government to be my nanny. I am far more than the sum of my “Lady Parts” thank you and I can worry about them myself! I espouse the principles held dear by my party and I believe now more than ever that those principles will lead to upward mobility and a better life for everyone, not just my generation.

I’ll repeat; we have 3 qualified candidates. I see no significant ideological differences. Certainly they are all honorable and loyal Republicans of unimpeachable character. All of them would a good job. Most importantly they have all run very clean campaigns. They are all to be congratulated for taking the high road. We may have our preferences, but no one should be upset over the results, if our first choice doesn’t win.

For me, it comes down to who fits the needs of the party at this time. This job requires innate political savvy and instincts. It takes someone who is all about getting results. It requires someone who has shown selfless dedication and ardent advocacy for the causes she believes in. Chanel Prunier embodies these personal qualities.

Therefore, I believe that Chanel is best of 3 good choices for this position. The MA-GOP will be served by electing her the next RNC National Committeewoman. I’m honored to give her my endorsement without reservation.

Chanel Prunier Sign

Sometimes Bigger IS Better

Ureneck vs. Dorcena – FIRST SUFFOLK SENATE DISTRICT

“No increase in Massachusetts taxes
I strongly oppose all tax hikes, including the Governor’s proposed income tax hike, and any efforts to tax internet sales. I do not support the proposed $500 million in new taxes for transportation spending. Government is already too big. The solution is to shrink the size of the government, not to increase the tax burden on the citizens of Massachusetts.”
Joe Ureneck, Republican candidate for First Suffolk Senate District, challenges Democrat opponent Linda Dorcena Forry to debate
Joe Ureneck, Dorchester native and Republican candidate for state senate, congratulates his Democrat challenger Linda Dorcena Forry on her primary victory and invites her to debate the issues facing district residents at a mutually agreed upon forum before the final election on May 28.
Following the April 30 primary voters in the First Suffolk District have a clear choice between the candidates. In contrast to his opponent Joe Ureneck supports stable and intact families, repeal of laws that break up families, reform of the court system, no new taxes and no national guardsmen in overseas conflict.
Joe is pro-life and pro-traditional family.
Joe invites Ms. Forry to explain her positions on the crucial issues facing the district in a debate before the final election on May 28.

Graham: Gomez run for Senate won’t help build GOP

Graham: Gomez run for Senate won’t help build GOP
Friday, May 3, 2013
PrintEmail Comments (102)
By:
Michael Graham

I knew that Massachusetts Republicans had to lower their ideological expectations if they wanted to win an election here in the Bay State.

I just didn’t know that included the Republican primary.

Once you start nominating Obama supporters who give money to uber-liberal Alan Khazei and were writing checks to Democratic congressional candidates last year, you haven’t lowered expectations. You’ve abandoned them.

That Gabriel Gomez “supported” Barack Obama in 2008 is not in doubt. He made that claim (“I supported Obama in 2008”) along with his pledge to support President Obama on amnesty and gun control, in a letter to Gov. Deval Patrick pleading for a free shot at John Kerry’s Senate seat.

What is in doubt, at least for Gomez supporters, is the definition of the word “support.” Gomez says that while he “supported” Obama, he didn’t actually vote for him.

Or as Gomez said (verbatim) on NECN: “What I meant by ‘I support the president,’ [sic] what I meant was that I support that the fact that the president is now finally, he campaigned on this before but didn’t do anything in his first term, he’s now elevated this to a national discussion.”

I don’t think that’s Spanish, but it’s sure not English …

So how did Gomez win? He won this election the old-fashioned way — he bought it.

Gomez outspent Michael Sullivan 4-1 … at least. But even worse, Gomez had the support of the state GOP establishment.

Why? Here’s former state GOP chairwoman Jennifer Nassour on Gabriel Gomez’s Republican bona fides:

“He’s a fresh face, he’s the new type of Republican, he’s Latino, he’s young, he’s camera friendly. When you look at everything he embodies — being able to go to his son’s Little League games — he’s who my demographic would want to see in office.”

So when the “Good-looking Latino Dads Little League Act of 2013” comes up for a vote, Massachusetts will have just the senator to sponsor it!

I know Republicans are worried about “low-information” voters, but is the solution really a “low-information” candidate? A guy whose entire campaign consisted of chanting “Navy Seal” and quoting the Pledge of Allegiance in Spanish?

Don’t bother asking Gomez supporters about his positions on the issues. It just makes them mad.

“In the Republican primary issues didn’t matter,” Nassour said.

Gomez is just the latest example of the Massachusetts GOP’s idiotic “magic bullet candidate” theory. Rather than doing the hard work of repairing the GOP brand, the super-geniuses of the state Republican Party look for candidates who they believe can somehow rise above it.

In most states RINO (Republican In Name Only) is an insult. Here, it’s official party dogma.

“But Michael, that’s the only way Republicans can win!” Sure it is. Just ask Congressman Tisei, Sen. Brown and Gov. Healey.

Being gutless, ideological sellouts is bad. But being gutless sellouts who keep losing is utterly unbearable.

No Republican can win this race because the party brand is too badly damaged. But imagine what a competent conservative could do to improve the GOP brand campaigning on the EBT mess, the immigration fiasco related to the Boston bombings and the Democrats’ obsession with tax hikes.

Instead the GOP is going to wage an identity-politics campaign by a candidate whose core message is going to be “I don’t really like Republicans either!”

Worse, Gomez’s shaky public performances show a candidate not yet ready for prime time. I’m afraid that by the time this election is over, we may learn that Gabriel Gomez is Spanish for “Joe Biden.”

Thanks, Massachusetts GOP. Thanks a lot.

Listen to Michael Graham noon to 3 p.m. weekdays 
on WCRN-AM (830).
Follow him on Twitter
@IAMMGraham or at 
www.michaelgraham.com.

MESSAGE TO ‘MODERATE’ REPUBLICANS: How about dropping your litmus test and actually allowing a fairly conservative Republican into your “BIG TENT”?

It’s clear, we can’t keep nominating LIBERAL “REPUBLICANS” who pretend to be “Moderates”.

Let’s recap the REPUBLICAN LOSERS:

MODERATEJohn McCain – presidential loser, who is not even a member of the senate leadership
MODERATEMitt Romney – ditto
MODERATEScott Brown – congress…..spent all his time pandering to Democrats and liberals, and sticking up the middle finger to any conservatives (sorry, it’s true, just ask a conservative)
MODERATE‘ (O.K., radical social liberal) Richard Tisei congress   (nice guy, don’t get me started),
MODERATEKerry Healey, governor…the rich lady who has lost every election she ever ran for, except ‘National State Committeewoman’ of which she garnered the obscure position via the LIBERAL vote on the Republican State Committee
MODERATECharlie Baker, governor, who made it a point to march in a gay pride parade and tell everyone he’s further left on the social issues than Barry Hussein Obama.
MODERATE‘  fill in the blank,……. the list is long.

This time, we have
MODERATEGOMEZ (DONATED TO OBAMA and other RADICAL LIBERALS)
MODERATEWINSLOW (DONATED to MANY MANY MANY LIBERAL AND ULTRA-RADICAL LIBERAL POLITICIANS, and is a “SOCIAL EXTREMIST CARRYING THE BANNER INTO BATTLE FOR GAY MARRIAGE AND ABORTION FUNDING BY TAXPAYERS”.

and fortunately
we have MIKE SULLIVAN.

Is he 100% conservative?  No. Close, but not 100%.
(Are there some SERIOUS issues with the liberal extremists he has on his campaign staff?  Yes.)

Is he 100% better than the other two Republicans?  YES.

He’s the best damn Republican candidate to run a campaign in Massachusetts in the past two decades.

MESSAGE TO LIBERAL REPUBLICANS:  How about dropping your litmus test and actually allowing a fairly conservative Republican into your “BIG TENT?”

I’m voting on Tues. for Mike Sullivan.  I hope you do too.

Lonnie Brennan

Founder, www.VoteCoreValues.org

 

 

*News Flash * RINO Weld Endorses Obama supporting Gomez

Former Massachusetts Governor and quintessential RINO William (Bill) Weld has endorsed Gabriel Gomez for US Senate. Of course the endorsement makes perfect sense. Bill Weld also endorsed Barack Hussein Obama in 2008, just as Gomez “supported” Obama in 08.   In response a half dozen new twitter hash-tags have appeared.

Bill Welld

#Kiss-of-Death

#Rinos-r-us

#cirrhosis-of-the-liver

#Go-Back-to-new-york

#yawn

#Someone-please-print-my-name-in-the-paper.

From the guy who prosecuted the shoe bomber

SULLIVAN’S STATEMENT ON BOSTON EXPLOSIONS

ALL CAMPAIGN ACTIVITIES SUSPENDED

(Abington, MA)- U.S. Senate Candidate Mike Sullivan released the following statement in response to the tragic explosions during the Boston Marathon today:

“Our hearts and prayers are with those injured in today’s horrific explosion during the Boston Marathon and the families of all concerned.

“I am confident in the combined efforts of the FBI, Boston Police Department, State Police and ATF, in their investigation into these explosions, that sadly have occurred on Patriot’s Day–a day with much local and national symbolism.

“While the causes of these explosions have not yet been determined, if not accidental, I know these agencies and others will identify those responsible for these horrific and cowardly acts of violence and hold them accountable to the fullest extent of the law.

“May we together as citizens of the Commonwealth and across this nation pray for all effected by this terrible event.”

 

The campaign of U.S. Senate candidate Mike Sullivan is cancelling all campaign activities for the remainder of the day.  The campaign will update the public and media on rescheduling today’s activities and on the resumption of a normal schedule.

Gomez Flops. Sullivan Shows TRUE GRIT

We heard it on the radio.

Now you can see the videos.
Howie Carr. Classy gentleman. Great moderator. Fair to both.
But even Howie couldn’t get a straight answer out of Gomez…

http://www.wrko.com/wrko-massachusetts-republican-us-senate-debate#audio

HowieCarr_150x150